a. Thinking a lot ![]() |
||
b. Eliminating flaws and biases in one’s thinking ![]() |
||
c. Suspending one’s judgment ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. Understanding the logical connections between ideas ![]() |
||
b. Inventing new concepts and possibilities ![]() |
||
c. Identifying, constructing, and evaluating arguments ![]() |
||
d. Detecting inconsistencies and common mistakes in reasoning ![]() |
||
e. Identify the relevance and importance of ideas ![]() |
a. Examining claims for possible biases ![]() |
||
b. Accumulating a large amount of information ![]() |
||
c. Maintaining beliefs from one’s upbringing ![]() |
||
d. Basing one’s beliefs on the advice of experts ![]() |
||
e. Dismissing evidence ![]() |
a. There are definite rules for reasoning correctly ![]() |
||
b. Correct reasoning can be improved by practice ![]() |
||
c. How much you know will always affect your ability to reason correctly ![]() |
||
d. Intellectual laziness can prevent one from reasoning correctly ![]() |
||
e. Reviewing one’s mistakes is crucial to improving one’s reasoning ![]() |
a. The meaning of conversational speech ![]() |
||
b. The truth or falsity of the statement ![]() |
||
c. The context in which the statement was uttered ![]() |
||
d. The emotional content of the statement ![]() |
||
e. The scientific value of the statement ![]() |
a. Reportive definition ![]() |
||
b. Stipulative definition ![]() |
||
c. Precising definition ![]() |
||
d. Persuasive definition ![]() |
||
e. Dictionary definition ![]() |
a. Inconsistent ![]() |
||
b. Circular ![]() |
||
c. Too wide ![]() |
||
d. Too narrow ![]() |
||
e. Too obscure ![]() |
a. The participants disagree about the facts ![]() |
||
b. The participants hold differing opinions ![]() |
||
c. The participants appeal to different authorities ![]() |
||
d. The participants base their positions on emotion ![]() |
||
e. The participants tacitly employ different definitions ![]() |
a. It is impossible to have Y without X ![]() |
||
b. It is possible to have Y without X ![]() |
||
c. Y is sometimes present when X is not ![]() |
||
d. X is sometimes present when Y is not ![]() |
||
e. The presence of X guarantees the presence of Y ![]() |
a. Paul buying me a steak is a necessary condition for me to drive to Texas with him. ![]() |
||
b. Paul buying me a steak is a sufficient condition for me to drive to Texas with him. ![]() |
||
c. Paul buying me a steak is a necessary and sufficient condition for me to drive to Texas with him. ![]() |
||
d. Paul buying me a steak is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for me to drive to Texas with him. ![]() |
||
e. Driving to Texas with Paul is a necessary condition for him buying me a steak. ![]() |
a. Logical necessity ![]() |
||
b. Empirical necessity ![]() |
||
c. Causal necessity ![]() |
||
d. Legal Necessity ![]() |
||
e. None of the above ![]() |
a. Referential ambiguity ![]() |
||
b. Syntactic ambiguity ![]() |
||
c. Vagueness ![]() |
||
d. Incomplete meaning ![]() |
||
e. Empty content ![]() |
a. Bill cannot come to work today because he hurt his back. ![]() |
||
b. I asked you on Monday to finish that report for me today. I asked you for it again on Tuesday. Where is it? ![]() |
||
c. I will pay my taxes. After all, I do not want the government to take my house, and that is what they will do if I do not pay my taxes. ![]() |
||
d. All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. So were about half of the Greeks. ![]() |
||
e. Money only causes problems. When I was young, we were very poor. I was only allowed to eat breakfast on the weekends. ![]() |
a. Moons are celestial bodies that orbit around planets ![]() |
||
b. The Earth cannot be a moon ![]() |
||
c. The Earth does not orbit around a planet ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. A and C ![]() |
a. They comprise an argument ![]() |
||
b. They comprise a valid argument ![]() |
||
c. They comprise a sound argument ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. A, B, and C ![]() |
a. They comprise an argument ![]() |
||
b. They comprise a valid argument ![]() |
||
c. They comprise a sound argument ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. A, B, and C ![]() |
a. All sound arguments are valid ![]() |
||
b. All valid arguments are sound ![]() |
||
c. All unsound arguments are invalid ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. A, B, and C ![]() |
a. Modus ponens ![]() |
||
b. Modus tollens ![]() |
||
c. Hypothetical syllogism ![]() |
||
d. Disjunctive syllogism ![]() |
||
e. Reductio ad absurdum ![]() |
a. Modus ponens ![]() |
||
b. Modus tollens ![]() |
||
c. Hypothetical syllogism ![]() |
||
d. Disjunctive syllogism ![]() |
||
e. Reductio ad absurdum ![]() |
a. Headaches are uncomfortable ![]() |
||
b. It is better to treat a headache than let it be ![]() |
||
c. We are all out of ibuprofen ![]() |
||
d. If I take an aspirin my headache will subside ![]() |
||
e. Aspirin is cheap at the corner store ![]() |
a. Valid ![]() |
||
b. Sound ![]() |
||
c. Strong ![]() |
||
d. True ![]() |
||
e. False ![]() |
a. They are deductively sound ![]() |
||
b. They have true premises ![]() |
||
c. They are either valid or strong ![]() |
||
d. Their premises are relevant to their conclusion ![]() |
||
e. Their premises do not beg the question ![]() |
a. Arrows pointing from one co-premise to the others ![]() |
||
b. Arrows pointing from the co-premises to the conclusion they support ![]() |
||
c. Lines that merge beneath the co-premises and form an arrow pointing to the conclusion they support ![]() |
||
d. Lines that divide beneath the conclusion and point to the premises that support it ![]() |
||
e. Arrows pointing from the conclusion to the co-premises ![]() |
a. Inductive ![]() |
||
b. Deductive ![]() |
||
c. Sound ![]() |
||
d. Valid ![]() |
||
e. Analogical ![]() |
a. Every whale is a mammal. Moby Dick is a whale. So Moby Dick is a mammal. ![]() |
||
b. Every whale is a mammal. Every mammal is an animal. So every whale is an animal. ![]() |
||
c. Every whale is a mammal. Nemo is not a mammal. So Nemo is not a whale. ![]() |
||
d. If Moby Dick is clever, he will get away. But Moby Dick is not clever. Therefore, he will not get away. ![]() |
||
e. No whale is an insect. Moby Dick is a whale. So Moby Dick is not an insect. ![]() |
a. Fallacy of inconsistency ![]() |
||
b. Fallacy of relevance ![]() |
||
c. Fallacy of insufficient evidence ![]() |
||
d. Fallacy of inappropriate presumption ![]() |
||
e. Fallacy of affirming the consequent ![]() |
a. False dilemma ![]() |
||
b. Ad hominem ![]() |
||
c. Red herring ![]() |
||
d. Affirming the consequent ![]() |
||
e. Genetic fallacy ![]() |
a. The conclusion does not follow from the premises ![]() |
||
b. A personal attack is given in place of a reason ![]() |
||
c. A word changes meaning mid-argument ![]() |
||
d. Only a limited set of alternatives are presented ![]() |
||
e. The conclusion is assumed in one of the premises ![]() |
a. Confirmation bias ![]() |
||
b. Framing bias ![]() |
||
c. Overconfidence effect ![]() |
||
d. Clustering illusion ![]() |
||
e. Gambler's fallacy ![]() |
a. Appeal to authority ![]() |
||
b. Appeal to common belief ![]() |
||
c. Appeal to fear ![]() |
||
d. Appeal to vanity ![]() |
||
e. Appeal to wishful thinking ![]() |
a. Concluding that X caused Y because X was close to Y in space ![]() |
||
b. Concluding that X caused Y because X followed Y in time ![]() |
||
c. Concluding that X caused Y because Y followed X in time ![]() |
||
d. Concluding that X could not have caused Y because X followed Y in time ![]() |
||
e. Concluding that X could not have caused Y because Y followed X in time ![]() |
a. Clouds make it rain, since it always starts to rain after clouds have formed. ![]() |
||
b. Finding four-leaf clovers is good luck, since something terrific always happens after you find one. ![]() |
||
c. News about employment is bad for the stock market, since the market always falls on days when bad employment figures are released. ![]() |
||
d. Boiling the water makes it safer to drink, since nobody got sick anymore after we started doing it. ![]() |
||
e. Drinking warm milk helps me relax, since I always fall asleep after drinking some. ![]() |
a. Ad hominem ![]() |
||
b. Red herring ![]() |
||
c. Bandwagon fallacy ![]() |
||
d. Straw man ![]() |
||
e. Moralistic fallacy ![]() |
a. One appeals to a dubious authority in order to support one's claims. ![]() |
||
b. One assumes that since X follows Y in time, that Y bust by the cause of X. ![]() |
||
c. One attributes views to one's opponent that they do not hold. ![]() |
||
d. One is influenced by the issue being framed in a positive or negative manner. ![]() |
||
e. One assumes that the parts have the some properties as the whole. ![]() |
a. False equity ![]() |
||
b. False compromise ![]() |
||
c. Equivocation ![]() |
||
d. False dilemma ![]() |
||
e. Appeal to ignorance ![]() |
a. Equivocation ![]() |
||
b. Suppressed evidence ![]() |
||
c. Straw man ![]() |
||
d. Fallacy of composition ![]() |
||
e. Slippery slope ![]() |
a. "Until the bank can demonstrate that I stole the money, I should be allowed to go free." ![]() |
||
b. "Nobody in the bank saw me steal the money, so I could not have done it." ![]() |
||
c. "Whenever Judge Punishment is trying the case, you know that justice will not be served." ![]() |
||
d. "I am innocent of robbing this bank. Everyone in town knows that I am a trustworthy person." ![]() |
||
e. "I may have robbed the bank, but I only did it because I have to pay my poor child's medical bills." ![]() |
a. "Either you're with me or you're against me." ![]() |
||
b. "There are two kinds of people in this world: dishonest ones and fools." ![]() |
||
c. "You can either divorce him or you can put up with his abuse." ![]() |
||
d. "The mailbox is either empty or it's not." ![]() |
||
e. "Politicians are either corrupt or they fail." ![]() |
a. It is topic neutral ![]() |
||
b. Its principles are necessary ![]() |
||
c. Its principles are non-contingent ![]() |
||
d. It models the psychology of reasoning ![]() |
||
e. It is often defined as a formal system ![]() |
a. Two plus two equals three. ![]() |
||
b. The prime minister has his tea everyday after lunch. ![]() |
||
c. Get in the house right now! ![]() |
||
d. It is unlawful to eat watermelons on the steps of the Capitol. ![]() |
||
e. Whenever I see willow trees I get really sad. ![]() |
a. "Tom is very happy." ![]() |
||
b. "Tom is not very depressed." ![]() |
||
c. "It is not the case that Tom is very depressed." ![]() |
||
d. "Tom is very impressed." ![]() |
||
e. "Someone other than Tom is very depressed." ![]() |
a. Simple sentences ![]() |
||
b. Complex sentences ![]() |
||
c. Sets of one or more sentences ![]() |
||
d. Sets of two or more sentences ![]() |
||
e. Sets of three or more sentences ![]() |
a. X is true ![]() |
||
b. X is false ![]() |
||
c. It is unknown whether X is true or false ![]() |
||
d. Y entails X ![]() |
||
e. X and Y are inconsistent ![]() |
a. X is true ![]() |
||
b. X is false ![]() |
||
c. Y is false ![]() |
||
d. A and C ![]() |
||
e. E and C ![]() |
a. ~UIOP ![]() |
||
b. UIOP->QERT ![]() |
||
c. (UIOP->QERT) ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. A and C ![]() |
a. Antecedent ![]() |
||
b. Consequent ![]() |
||
c. Conditional ![]() |
||
d. Connective ![]() |
||
e. Conjunct ![]() |
a. (P&Q) ![]() |
||
b. ((P&Q)&R) ![]() |
||
c. S ![]() |
||
d. Q ![]() |
||
e. R ![]() |
a. P is true and Q is true ![]() |
||
b. P is true and Q if false ![]() |
||
c. P is false and Q is true ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. P is true and Q is true ![]() |
||
b. P is true and Q is false ![]() |
||
c. P is false and Q is true ![]() |
||
d. P is false and Q is false ![]() |
||
e. All of the above ![]() |
a. ((P&Q)->~R) ![]() |
||
b. ((P&Q)^~R) ![]() |
||
c. (~(P&Q)->R) ![]() |
||
d. (~(P&Q)->~R) ![]() |
||
e. ~(P&Q)->R ![]() |
a. ((P->Q)&R) is false ![]() |
||
b. ((P->Q)&R) is true ![]() |
||
c. (P<->(Q<->R)) is true ![]() |
||
d. A and C ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. One member ![]() |
||
b. One or more members ![]() |
||
c. An infinite number of members ![]() |
||
d. No members ![]() |
||
e. All of the above ![]() |
a. Some P are Q ![]() |
||
b. Some Q are P ![]() |
||
c. Nothing is Q ![]() |
||
d. A and C ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. Nothing ![]() |
||
b. Everything ![]() |
||
c. The class of things that are neither P nor Q ![]() |
||
d. A and C ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. Every P is Q ![]() |
||
b. Every Q is P ![]() |
||
c. Everything is P ![]() |
||
d. Everything is Q ![]() |
||
e. Everything is Q but not P ![]() |
a. Everything is P or Q ![]() |
||
b. Every P is Q ![]() |
||
c. Everything is P but not Q ![]() |
||
d. Everything is Q but not P ![]() |
||
e. Nothing is Q ![]() |
a. Everything is P or Q ![]() |
||
b. Nothing is both P and Q ![]() |
||
c. Every P is Q ![]() |
||
d. Every Q is P ![]() |
||
e. Every P is Q and every Q is P ![]() |
a. Some A are C ![]() |
||
b. Something is A if and only if it is not C ![]() |
||
c. Everything is B ![]() |
||
d. A and C ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. Something is both A and C ![]() |
||
b. Something is A and B but not C ![]() |
||
c. Something is A but not B or C ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. Something is A, B, and C ![]() |
||
b. Everything is A ![]() |
||
c. Something is A but not B ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. A, B, and C ![]() |
a. Valid ![]() |
||
b. Invalid ![]() |
a. Valid ![]() |
||
b. Invalid ![]() |
a. Diagrams with more than three circles are difficult to work with ![]() |
||
b. They have limited expressive power ![]() |
||
c. They are subject to multiple interpretations ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. A, B and C ![]() |
a. A confirmed hypothesis increases the probability that a theory is true ![]() |
||
b. A confirmed hypothesis establishes that a theory is true ![]() |
||
c. A confirmed hypothesis indicates that alternative hypotheses need not be taken into account ![]() |
||
d. A disconfirmed hypothesis indicates that a theory is false ![]() |
||
e. A disconfirmed hypothesis decreases the probability that a theory is false ![]() |
a. Evaluate the logical consistency of the hypothesis and the predictions ![]() |
||
b. Use experiments to check whether predictions are correct ![]() |
||
c. If the predictions are correct, then the hypothesis is confirmed. If not, then the hypothesis is disconfirmed ![]() |
||
d. Identify the hypothesis to be tested ![]() |
||
e. Generate prediction from the hypothesis ![]() |
a. Establish the truth or falsity of scientific theories ![]() |
||
b. Confirm or disconfirm hypothesis on the basis of the predictions they generate ![]() |
||
c. Minimize the influence of the scientist's bias on the outcome of an experiment ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. An inference from an infinite sample to a specific conclusion ![]() |
||
b. An inference from a finite sample to a specific conclusion ![]() |
||
c. An inference from an infinite sample to a general conclusion ![]() |
||
d. An inference from a finite sample to a general conclusion ![]() |
||
e. An inference from a singular piece of data to a general conclusion ![]() |
a. Which theory more precisely identifies the causal mechanism behind the phenomena in question ![]() |
||
b. Which theory is accepted by the most prominent scientists ![]() |
||
c. Which theory explains a greater number of phenomena ![]() |
||
d. Which theory involves the least number of assumptions ![]() |
||
e. Which theory coheres best with the existing body of scientific theories ![]() |
a. Difference ![]() |
||
b. Concomitant variation ![]() |
||
c. Agreement ![]() |
||
d. Residues ![]() |
||
e. The joint method ![]() |
a. Consider cases in which great intelligence occurs in the absence of large noses ![]() |
||
b. Consider cases in which large noses occur in the absence of great intelligence ![]() |
||
c. Consider whether there is another factor that is the cause of both having a large nose and greater intelligence ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. A, B and C ![]() |
a. Saccharine causes obesity in children ![]() |
||
b. Sacharine contributes to obesity in children ![]() |
||
c. Obese children are more likely to crave saccharine ![]() |
||
d. Saccharine consumption correlates with childhood obesity ![]() |
||
e. Childhood obesity is a contributing cause of saccharine consumption ![]() |
a. Provide a convenient means of representing causal loops ![]() |
||
b. Help to differentiate causation from mere correlation ![]() |
||
c. Help to differentiate between major and minor causes ![]() |
||
d. Provide statistical information about causal links ![]() |
||
e. Provide a convenient top-to-bottom visual representation of causes ![]() |
a. Fallacy of reversing causal directoin ![]() |
||
b. Fallacy of mistaking correlation with causation ![]() |
||
c. Fallacy of confusing good causal consequences with reasons for belief ![]() |
||
d. Genetic fallacy ![]() |
||
e. Fallacy of the single cause ![]() |
a. It posits a correlation based on insufficient evidence ![]() |
||
b. It assumes that not washing his hands is the only significant difference between the day he got the flu and every other day ![]() |
||
c. It fails to take into account that he may have failed to wash his hands because he had the flu, and not the other way around. ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. Reasoning from specific cases to a general conclusion ![]() |
||
b. Reasoning from general principles to a specific prediction ![]() |
||
c. Reasoning from past regularities to predictions about the future events ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. A comes before B in time ![]() |
||
b. B comes before A in time ![]() |
||
c. A and B occur simultaneously ![]() |
||
d. A never occurs in the absence of B ![]() |
||
e. B never occurs in the absence of A ![]() |
a. Empirical ![]() |
||
b. Conceptual ![]() |
||
c. Evaluative ![]() |
||
d. Critical ![]() |
||
e. Hypothetical ![]() |
a. The distinction between intrinsic and instrumental values ![]() |
||
b. Observations and experiments ![]() |
||
c. Logic and the meaning of words ![]() |
||
d. Statistical evidence ![]() |
||
e. The help of experts in the relevant field ![]() |
a. Take stock of all available evidence ![]() |
||
b. Understand the nature of the problem ![]() |
||
c. Monitor the outcome of the plan ![]() |
||
d. Draw up a plan to solve the problem ![]() |
||
e. Try out the plan ![]() |
a. The hypothetical deductive method ![]() |
||
b. The method of decomposition ![]() |
||
c. The method of agreement ![]() |
||
d. Venn diagrams ![]() |
||
e. The method of difference ![]() |
a. A square ![]() |
||
b. An oval ![]() |
||
c. A diamond ![]() |
||
d. a parallelogram ![]() |
||
e. An arrow ![]() |
a. Flowchart ![]() |
||
b. Decision Tree ![]() |
||
c. Decision Table ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. Maximin ![]() |
||
b. Maximax ![]() |
||
c. Minimax regret ![]() |
||
d. Opportunity loss ![]() |
||
e. Principle of expected value ![]() |
a. The value of a given option in the best possible scenario ![]() |
||
b. The value of a given option in the worst possible scenario ![]() |
||
c. The average value of a given option over the long run ![]() |
||
d. The best outcome of taking the most conservative option ![]() |
||
e. The worst outcome of taking the most risky option ![]() |
a. The creation of new ideas and the modification of old ideas ![]() |
||
b. The creation of new ideas the the creation of new connections between ideas ![]() |
||
c. The creation of new ideas and the evaluation and modification of new ideas ![]() |
||
d. The creation of artwork and expressing one's ideas and emotions through art ![]() |
||
e. The creation of artwork and the modification of old ideas ![]() |
a. Analogy ![]() |
||
b. Search ![]() |
||
c. Perspective shift ![]() |
||
d. Feature list ![]() |
||
e. Making new connections ![]() |
a. Buying 100 dough balls ![]() |
||
b. Buying 200 dough balls ![]() |
||
c. Buying 400 dough balls ![]() |
||
d. Buying 600 dough balls ![]() |
||
e. Buying 800 dough balls ![]() |
a. Buying 100 dough balls ![]() |
||
b. Buying 200 dough balls ![]() |
||
c. Buying 400 dough balls ![]() |
||
d. Buying 600 dough balls ![]() |
||
e. Buying 800 dough balls ![]() |
a. Moralistic fallacy ![]() |
||
b. Naturalistic fallacy ![]() |
||
c. Bandwagon fallacy ![]() |
||
d. Fallacist's fallacy ![]() |
||
e. Irrelevant appeal ![]() |
a. Intrinsic value ![]() |
||
b. Instrumental value ![]() |
||
c. Extrinsic value ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. It is valued as a means to some end ![]() |
||
b. It is valued as an end in itself ![]() |
||
c. It is valued as a basic condition for human life ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. X is right because God says X is right ![]() |
||
b. God says X is right because X is right ![]() |
||
c. X is right for reasons independent of what God says ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. Murder must be impermissible because morality depends on God ![]() |
||
b. If we believe that murder is impermissible, it is because we have interpreted God's will incorrectly ![]() |
||
c. We cannot accept that murder is impermissible just because God says it is, since God himself may have independent grounds for believing that murder is impermissible ![]() |
||
d. The impermissibility of murder cannot depend on God because different religions worship different gods ![]() |
||
e. The impermissibility of murder cannot depend of God because it depends on whether the act was performed in self-defense ![]() |
a. Moral absolutist ![]() |
||
b. Moral contextualist ![]() |
||
c. Moral relativist ![]() |
||
d. Moral objectivist ![]() |
||
e. Moral subjectivist ![]() |
a. Each society possesses its own objective normative facts ![]() |
||
b. What is right or wrong depends on the moral framework of the society in question ![]() |
||
c. There are no objective normative facts ![]() |
||
d. A and B ![]() |
||
e. B and C ![]() |
a. We have generated a moral principle by generalizing from a moral intuition ![]() |
||
b. We have formulated a prediction about a concrete case based on a moral principle ![]() |
||
c. We have tested a prediction against a moral intuition ![]() |
||
d. We have adjusted a moral intuition to conform with a moral principle ![]() |
||
e. We have adjusted a moral principle to conform with a moral intuition ![]() |
a. We have generated a moral principle by generalizing from a moral intuition ![]() |
||
b. We have formulated a prediction about a concrete case based on a moral principle ![]() |
||
c. We have tested a prediction against a moral intuition ![]() |
||
d. We have adjusted a moral intuition to conform with a moral principle ![]() |
||
e. We have adjusted a moral principle to conform with a moral intuition ![]() |
a. There is nothing wrong with an animal altering its habitat. ![]() |
||
b. In fact, there are no animals that do not alter their habitat in some way. ![]() |
||
c. Human beings are no different. ![]() |
||
d. Therefore, the human impact on the environment is natural and does not need to be scrutinized. ![]() |
||
e. Global warming is just our way of making ourselves at home. ![]() |
a. There is nothing wrong with an animal altering its habitat. ![]() |
||
b. In fact, there are no animals that do not alter their habitat in some way. ![]() |
||
c. Human beings are no different. ![]() |
||
d. Therefore, the human impact on the environment is natural and does not need to be scrutinized. ![]() |
||
e. Global warming is just our way of making ourselves at home. ![]() |
a. I have a claim-right against the plumber with regard to his fixing my sink. ![]() |
||
b. The plumber has the privilege not to fix my sink. ![]() |
||
c. I have a duty to see that the sink gets fixed. ![]() |
||
d. I have a power over the plumber with respect to his fixing my sink. ![]() |
||
e. The plumber has an immunity against me with respect to my not paying him. ![]() |