a. Thinking a lot | ||
b. Eliminating flaws and biases in one's thinking | ||
c. Suspending one's judgment | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. Understanding the logical connections between ideas | ||
b. Inventing new concepts and possibilities | ||
c. Identifying, constructing, and evaluating arguments | ||
d. Detecting inconsistencies and common mistakes in reasoning | ||
e. Identify the relevance and importance of ideas |
a. Examining claims for possible biases | ||
b. Accumulating a large amount of information | ||
c. Maintaining beliefs from one's upbringing | ||
d. Basing one's beliefs on the advice of experts | ||
e. Dismissing evidence |
a. There are definite rules for reasoning correctly | ||
b. Correct reasoning can be improved by practice | ||
c. How much you know will always affect your ability to reason correctly | ||
d. Intellectual laziness can prevent one from reasoning correctly | ||
e. Reviewing one's mistakes is crucial to improving one's reasoning |
a. The meaning of conversational speech | ||
b. The truth or falsity of the statement | ||
c. The context in which the statement was uttered | ||
d. The emotional content of the statement | ||
e. The scientific value of the statement |
a. Reportive definition | ||
b. Stipulative definition | ||
c. Precising definition | ||
d. Persuasive definition | ||
e. Dictionary definition |
a. Inconsistent | ||
b. Circular | ||
c. Too wide | ||
d. Too narrow | ||
e. Too obscure |
a. The participants disagree about the facts | ||
b. The participants hold differing opinions | ||
c. The participants appeal to different authorities | ||
d. The participants base their positions on emotion | ||
e. The participants tacitly employ different definitions |
a. It is impossible to have Y without X | ||
b. It is possible to have Y without X | ||
c. Y is sometimes present when X is not | ||
d. X is sometimes present when Y is not | ||
e. The presence of X guarantees the presence of Y |
a. Paul buying me a steak is a necessary condition for me to drive to Texas with him. | ||
b. Paul buying me a steak is a sufficient condition for me to drive to Texas with him. | ||
c. Paul buying me a steak is a necessary and sufficient condition for me to drive to Texas with him. | ||
d. Paul buying me a steak is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for me to drive to Texas with him. | ||
e. Driving to Texas with Paul is a necessary condition for him buying me a steak. |
a. Logical necessity | ||
b. Empirical necessity | ||
c. Causal necessity | ||
d. Legal Necessity | ||
e. None of the above |
a. Referential ambiguity | ||
b. Syntactic ambiguity | ||
c. Vagueness | ||
d. Incomplete meaning | ||
e. Empty content |
a. Bill cannot come to work today because he hurt his back. | ||
b. I asked you on Monday to finish that report for me today. I asked you for it again on Tuesday. Where is it? | ||
c. I will pay my taxes. After all, I do not want the government to take my house, and that is what they will do if I do not pay my taxes. | ||
d. All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. So were about half of the Greeks. | ||
e. Money only causes problems. When I was young, we were very poor. I was only allowed to eat breakfast on the weekends. |
a. Moons are celestial bodies that orbit around planets | ||
b. The Earth cannot be a moon | ||
c. The Earth does not orbit around a planet | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. A and C |
a. They comprise an argument | ||
b. They comprise a valid argument | ||
c. They comprise a sound argument | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. A, B, and C |
a. They comprise an argument | ||
b. They comprise a valid argument | ||
c. They comprise a sound argument | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. A, B, and C |
a. All sound arguments are valid | ||
b. All valid arguments are sound | ||
c. All unsound arguments are invalid | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. A, B, and C |
a. Modus ponens | ||
b. Modus tollens | ||
c. Hypothetical syllogism | ||
d. Disjunctive syllogism | ||
e. Reductio ad absurdum |
a. Modus ponens | ||
b. Modus tollens | ||
c. Hypothetical syllogism | ||
d. Disjunctive syllogism | ||
e. Reductio ad absurdum |
a. Headaches are uncomfortable | ||
b. It is better to treat a headache than let it be | ||
c. We are all out of ibuprofen | ||
d. If I take an aspirin my headache will subside | ||
e. Aspirin is cheap at the corner store |
a. Valid | ||
b. Sound | ||
c. Strong | ||
d. True | ||
e. False |
a. They are deductively sound | ||
b. They have true premises | ||
c. They are either valid or strong | ||
d. Their premises are relevant to their conclusion | ||
e. Their premises do not beg the question |
a. Arrows pointing from one co-premise to the others | ||
b. Arrows pointing from the co-premises to the conclusion they support | ||
c. Lines that merge beneath the co-premises and form an arrow pointing to the conclusion they support | ||
d. Lines that divide beneath the conclusion and point to the premises that support it | ||
e. Arrows pointing from the conclusion to the co-premises |
a. Inductive | ||
b. Deductive | ||
c. Sound | ||
d. Valid | ||
e. Analogical |
a. Every whale is a mammal. Moby Dick is a whale. So Moby Dick is a mammal. | ||
b. Every whale is a mammal. Every mammal is an animal. So every whale is an animal. | ||
c. Every whale is a mammal. Nemo is not a mammal. So Nemo is not a whale. | ||
d. If Moby Dick is clever, he will get away. But Moby Dick is not clever. Therefore, he will not get away. | ||
e. No whale is an insect. Moby Dick is a whale. So Moby Dick is not an insect. |
a. Fallacy of inconsistency | ||
b. Fallacy of relevance | ||
c. Fallacy of insufficient evidence | ||
d. Fallacy of inappropriate presumption | ||
e. Fallacy of affirming the consequent |
a. False dilemma | ||
b. Ad hominem | ||
c. Red herring | ||
d. Affirming the consequent | ||
e. Genetic fallacy |
a. The conclusion does not follow from the premises | ||
b. A personal attack is given in place of a reason | ||
c. A word changes meaning mid-argument | ||
d. Only a limited set of alternatives are presented | ||
e. The conclusion is assumed in one of the premises |
a. Confirmation bias | ||
b. Framing bias | ||
c. Overconfidence effect | ||
d. Clustering illusion | ||
e. Gambler's fallacy |
a. Appeal to authority | ||
b. Appeal to common belief | ||
c. Appeal to fear | ||
d. Appeal to vanity | ||
e. Appeal to wishful thinking |
a. Concluding that X caused Y because X was close to Y in space | ||
b. Concluding that X caused Y because X followed Y in time | ||
c. Concluding that X caused Y because Y followed X in time | ||
d. Concluding that X could not have caused Y because X followed Y in time | ||
e. Concluding that X could not have caused Y because Y followed X in time |
a. Clouds make it rain, since it always starts to rain after clouds have formed. | ||
b. Finding four-leaf clovers is good luck, since something terrific always happens after you find one. | ||
c. News about employment is bad for the stock market, since the market always falls on days when bad employment figures are released. | ||
d. Boiling the water makes it safer to drink, since nobody got sick anymore after we started doing it. | ||
e. Drinking warm milk helps me relax, since I always fall asleep after drinking some. |
a. Ad hominem | ||
b. Red herring | ||
c. Bandwagon fallacy | ||
d. Straw man | ||
e. Moralistic fallacy |
a. One appeals to a dubious authority in order to support one's claims. | ||
b. One assumes that since X follows Y in time, that Y bust by the cause of X. | ||
c. One attributes views to one's opponent that they do not hold. | ||
d. One is influenced by the issue being framed in a positive or negative manner. | ||
e. One assumes that the parts have the some properties as the whole. |
a. False equity | ||
b. False compromise | ||
c. Equivocation | ||
d. False dilemma | ||
e. Appeal to ignorance |
a. Equivocation | ||
b. Suppressed evidence | ||
c. Straw man | ||
d. Fallacy of composition | ||
e. Slippery slope |
a. "Until the bank can demonstrate that I stole the money, I should be allowed to go free." | ||
b. "Nobody in the bank saw me steal the money, so I could not have done it." | ||
c. "Whenever Judge Punishment is trying the case, you know that justice will not be served." | ||
d. "I am innocent of robbing this bank. Everyone in town knows that I am a trustworthy person." | ||
e. "I may have robbed the bank, but I only did it because I have to pay my poor child's medical bills." |
a. "Either you're with me or you're against me." | ||
b. "There are two kinds of people in this world: dishonest ones and fools." | ||
c. "You can either divorce him or you can put up with his abuse." | ||
d. "The mailbox is either empty or it's not." | ||
e. "Politicians are either corrupt or they fail." |
a. It is topic neutral | ||
b. Its principles are necessary | ||
c. Its principles are non-contingent | ||
d. It models the psychology of reasoning | ||
e. It is often defined as a formal system |
a. Two plus two equals three. | ||
b. The prime minister has his tea everyday after lunch. | ||
c. Get in the house right now! | ||
d. It is unlawful to eat watermelons on the steps of the Capitol. | ||
e. Whenever I see willow trees I get really sad. |
a. "Tom is very happy." | ||
b. "Tom is not very depressed." | ||
c. "It is not the case that Tom is very depressed." | ||
d. "Tom is very impressed." | ||
e. "Someone other than Tom is very depressed." |
a. Simple sentences | ||
b. Complex sentences | ||
c. Sets of one or more sentences | ||
d. Sets of two or more sentences | ||
e. Sets of three or more sentences |
a. X is true | ||
b. X is false | ||
c. It is unknown whether X is true or false | ||
d. Y entails X | ||
e. X and Y are inconsistent |
a. X is true | ||
b. X is false | ||
c. Y is false | ||
d. A and C | ||
e. E and C |
a. ~UIOP | ||
b. UIOP->QERT | ||
c. (UIOP->QERT) | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. A and C |
a. Antecedent | ||
b. Consequent | ||
c. Conditional | ||
d. Connective | ||
e. Conjunct |
a. (P&Q) | ||
b. ((P&Q)&R) | ||
c. S | ||
d. Q | ||
e. R |
a. P is true and Q is true | ||
b. P is true and Q if false | ||
c. P is false and Q is true | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. P is true and Q is true | ||
b. P is true and Q is false | ||
c. P is false and Q is true | ||
d. P is false and Q is false | ||
e. All of the above |
a. ((P&Q)->~R) | ||
b. ((P&Q)^~R) | ||
c. (~(P&Q)->R) | ||
d. (~(P&Q)->~R) | ||
e. ~(P&Q)->R |
a. ((P->Q)&R) is false | ||
b. ((P->Q)&R) is true | ||
c. (P<->(Q<->R)) is true | ||
d. A and C | ||
e. B and C |
a. One member | ||
b. One or more members | ||
c. An infinite number of members | ||
d. No members | ||
e. All of the above |
a. Some P are Q | ||
b. Some Q are P | ||
c. Nothing is Q | ||
d. A and C | ||
e. B and C |
a. Nothing | ||
b. Everything | ||
c. The class of things that are neither P nor Q | ||
d. A and C | ||
e. B and C |
a. Every P is Q | ||
b. Every Q is P | ||
c. Everything is P | ||
d. Everything is Q | ||
e. Everything is Q but not P |
a. Everything is P or Q | ||
b. Every P is Q | ||
c. Everything is P but not Q | ||
d. Everything is Q but not P | ||
e. Nothing is Q |
a. Everything is P or Q | ||
b. Nothing is both P and Q | ||
c. Every P is Q | ||
d. Every Q is P | ||
e. Every P is Q and every Q is P |
a. Some A are C | ||
b. Something is A if and only if it is not C | ||
c. Everything is B | ||
d. A and C | ||
e. B and C |
a. Something is both A and C | ||
b. Something is A and B but not C | ||
c. Something is A but not B or C | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. Something is A, B, and C | ||
b. Everything is A | ||
c. Something is A but not B | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. A, B, and C |
a. Valid | ||
b. Invalid |
a. Valid | ||
b. Invalid |
a. Diagrams with more than three circles are difficult to work with | ||
b. They have limited expressive power | ||
c. They are subject to multiple interpretations | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. A, B and C |
a. A confirmed hypothesis increases the probability that a theory is true | ||
b. A confirmed hypothesis establishes that a theory is true | ||
c. A confirmed hypothesis indicates that alternative hypotheses need not be taken into account | ||
d. A disconfirmed hypothesis indicates that a theory is false | ||
e. A disconfirmed hypothesis decreases the probability that a theory is false |
a. Evaluate the logical consistency of the hypothesis and the predictions | ||
b. Use experiments to check whether predictions are correct | ||
c. If the predictions are correct, then the hypothesis is confirmed. If not, then the hypothesis is disconfirmed | ||
d. Identify the hypothesis to be tested | ||
e. Generate prediction from the hypothesis |
a. Establish the truth or falsity of scientific theories | ||
b. Confirm or disconfirm hypothesis on the basis of the predictions they generate | ||
c. Minimize the influence of the scientist's bias on the outcome of an experiment | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. An inference from an infinite sample to a specific conclusion | ||
b. An inference from a finite sample to a specific conclusion | ||
c. An inference from an infinite sample to a general conclusion | ||
d. An inference from a finite sample to a general conclusion | ||
e. An inference from a singular piece of data to a general conclusion |
a. Which theory more precisely identifies the causal mechanism behind the phenomena in question | ||
b. Which theory is accepted by the most prominent scientists | ||
c. Which theory explains a greater number of phenomena | ||
d. Which theory involves the least number of assumptions | ||
e. Which theory coheres best with the existing body of scientific theories |
a. Difference | ||
b. Concomitant variation | ||
c. Agreement | ||
d. Residues | ||
e. The joint method |
a. Consider cases in which great intelligence occurs in the absence of large noses | ||
b. Consider cases in which large noses occur in the absence of great intelligence | ||
c. Consider whether there is another factor that is the cause of both having a large nose and greater intelligence | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. A, B and C |
a. Saccharine causes obesity in children | ||
b. Sacharine contributes to obesity in children | ||
c. Obese children are more likely to crave saccharine | ||
d. Saccharine consumption correlates with childhood obesity | ||
e. Childhood obesity is a contributing cause of saccharine consumption |
a. Provide a convenient means of representing causal loops | ||
b. Help to differentiate causation from mere correlation | ||
c. Help to differentiate between major and minor causes | ||
d. Provide statistical information about causal links | ||
e. Provide a convenient top-to-bottom visual representation of causes |
a. Fallacy of reversing causal directoin | ||
b. Fallacy of mistaking correlation with causation | ||
c. Fallacy of confusing good causal consequences with reasons for belief | ||
d. Genetic fallacy | ||
e. Fallacy of the single cause |
a. It posits a correlation based on insufficient evidence | ||
b. It assumes that not washing his hands is the only significant difference between the day he got the flu and every other day | ||
c. It fails to take into account that he may have failed to wash his hands because he had the flu, and not the other way around. | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. Reasoning from specific cases to a general conclusion | ||
b. Reasoning from general principles to a specific prediction | ||
c. Reasoning from past regularities to predictions about the future events | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. A comes before B in time | ||
b. B comes before A in time | ||
c. A and B occur simultaneously | ||
d. A never occurs in the absence of B | ||
e. B never occurs in the absence of A |
a. Empirical | ||
b. Conceptual | ||
c. Evaluative | ||
d. Critical | ||
e. Hypothetical |
a. The distinction between intrinsic and instrumental values | ||
b. Observations and experiments | ||
c. Logic and the meaning of words | ||
d. Statistical evidence | ||
e. The help of experts in the relevant field |
a. Take stock of all available evidence | ||
b. Understand the nature of the problem | ||
c. Monitor the outcome of the plan | ||
d. Draw up a plan to solve the problem | ||
e. Try out the plan |
a. The hypothetical deductive method | ||
b. The method of decomposition | ||
c. The method of agreement | ||
d. Venn diagrams | ||
e. The method of difference |
a. A square | ||
b. An oval | ||
c. A diamond | ||
d. a parallelogram | ||
e. An arrow |
a. Flowchart | ||
b. Decision Tree | ||
c. Decision Table | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. Maximin | ||
b. Maximax | ||
c. Minimax regret | ||
d. Opportunity loss | ||
e. Principle of expected value |
a. The value of a given option in the best possible scenario | ||
b. The value of a given option in the worst possible scenario | ||
c. The average value of a given option over the long run | ||
d. The best outcome of taking the most conservative option | ||
e. The worst outcome of taking the most risky option |
a. The creation of new ideas and the modification of old ideas | ||
b. The creation of new ideas the the creation of new connections between ideas | ||
c. The creation of new ideas and the evaluation and modification of new ideas | ||
d. The creation of artwork and expressing one's ideas and emotions through art | ||
e. The creation of artwork and the modification of old ideas |
a. Analogy | ||
b. Search | ||
c. Perspective shift | ||
d. Feature list | ||
e. Making new connections |
a. Buying 100 dough balls | ||
b. Buying 200 dough balls | ||
c. Buying 400 dough balls | ||
d. Buying 600 dough balls | ||
e. Buying 800 dough balls |
a. Buying 100 dough balls | ||
b. Buying 200 dough balls | ||
c. Buying 400 dough balls | ||
d. Buying 600 dough balls | ||
e. Buying 800 dough balls |
a. Moralistic fallacy | ||
b. Naturalistic fallacy | ||
c. Bandwagon fallacy | ||
d. Fallacist's fallacy | ||
e. Irrelevant appeal |
a. Intrinsic value | ||
b. Instrumental value | ||
c. Extrinsic value | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. It is valued as a means to some end | ||
b. It is valued as an end in itself | ||
c. It is valued as a basic condition for human life | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. X is right because God says X is right | ||
b. God says X is right because X is right | ||
c. X is right for reasons independent of what God says | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. Murder must be impermissible because morality depends on God | ||
b. If we believe that murder is impermissible, it is because we have interpreted God's will incorrectly | ||
c. We cannot accept that murder is impermissible just because God says it is, since God himself may have independent grounds for believing that murder is impermissible | ||
d. The impermissibility of murder cannot depend on God because different religions worship different gods | ||
e. The impermissibility of murder cannot depend of God because it depends on whether the act was performed in self-defense |
a. Moral absolutist | ||
b. Moral contextualist | ||
c. Moral relativist | ||
d. Moral objectivist | ||
e. Moral subjectivist |
a. Each society possesses its own objective normative facts | ||
b. What is right or wrong depends on the moral framework of the society in question | ||
c. There are no objective normative facts | ||
d. A and B | ||
e. B and C |
a. We have generated a moral principle by generalizing from a moral intuition | ||
b. We have formulated a prediction about a concrete case based on a moral principle | ||
c. We have tested a prediction against a moral intuition | ||
d. We have adjusted a moral intuition to conform with a moral principle | ||
e. We have adjusted a moral principle to conform with a moral intuition |
a. We have generated a moral principle by generalizing from a moral intuition | ||
b. We have formulated a prediction about a concrete case based on a moral principle | ||
c. We have tested a prediction against a moral intuition | ||
d. We have adjusted a moral intuition to conform with a moral principle | ||
e. We have adjusted a moral principle to conform with a moral intuition |
a. There is nothing wrong with an animal altering its habitat. | ||
b. In fact, there are no animals that do not alter their habitat in some way. | ||
c. Human beings are no different. | ||
d. Therefore, the human impact on the environment is natural and does not need to be scrutinized. | ||
e. Global warming is just our way of making ourselves at home. |
a. There is nothing wrong with an animal altering its habitat. | ||
b. In fact, there are no animals that do not alter their habitat in some way. | ||
c. Human beings are no different. | ||
d. Therefore, the human impact on the environment is natural and does not need to be scrutinized. | ||
e. Global warming is just our way of making ourselves at home. |
a. I have a claim-right against the plumber with regard to his fixing my sink. | ||
b. The plumber has the privilege not to fix my sink. | ||
c. I have a duty to see that the sink gets fixed. | ||
d. I have a power over the plumber with respect to his fixing my sink. | ||
e. The plumber has an immunity against me with respect to my not paying him. |